Welcome to issue 2 of The Insider! In this Article we are going to be announcing the winner of the contest and talk about the feud between Molsen and Libertines. Where i went deep into the subject and had several interviews.
First to announce the winner of the contest. drum roll.......... the winner is.... ME! wow what a surprise i cant believe it. i would like to thank my mom for making this happen! JK! the actual winner is!
EtherealCookie CONGRATS! a sum of gold will be given to you in the next 24 hours.
First i will talk about our Military and economy then on to the good stuff in politics. It has been really slow for war in Canada, we have to resort to fighting for other countries! I never thought it would come down to it. Also a new stock company has come up, ran by the infamous
Molson , It seems this one has the potential to make a difference. As for our market.. it sucks, i am currently in the USA and there is a much bigger variety and option. the pay is also much better for jobs. We really need a baby boom, which might happen soon.
Now to politics. Our topic this week is the feud between
Molson and
libertines . Lets start it off with some PM messages that i have. I talked to Lib he gave me a sentence and Molson gave me about 6 paragraphs.
Thiizic
hey
i was wondering if you could comment on the situation between you and molsen for my next article.
whats going on between you 2 and whats your side of the story
----------
libertines
You can read the comments, not much more to say
----------!
That was Probably the best interview i have ever done. But the lack of info from lib made me skeptical.
so i decided to talk to Molsen
----------
Molson
The issue between myself and Libs is mostly his personal vendetta against myself. I am an open and honest person who does not feel
the need to follow the status quo just to make a name for myself. During the Libs regime, I have wrote a few articles going over some of the mistakes they were making and I also posted some about the things they did right. However, Libs and his followers only say the negative things I was pointing out and made it their goal to discredit me in order to save face. Many times I had received PMs asking to join them and I don't think they liked it when I refused due to my difference of opinion on what they were doing.
I think Libs took that personal which is why he jumped on the last article I published claiming I revealed private information.
Both myself and Libs know that he was blowing smoke and trying to make me the villain. I think I made a strong public case proving I am innocent and there are 2 sets of rules for players and I did so without breaking my moral code and releasing informants and private conversations.
Sidenote: don't be afraid to take as many screenshots as you can. Don't publish them but make sure you have them just in case. lol
As for corruption, it is hard to say and prove. No one in government keeps any records and it is impossible to determine where
they are spending the money. The only thing I have really noticed is that the BoC never puts money on the market when Libs has his on there.
Also, he seems to be buying dirt cheap diamonds from BoC companies. Proving this is going to be hard though due to the lack of physical evidence.
----------!
After reviewing his essay i had some questions for the congress and wanted to see what other people thought.
---------
So i went to the forums and questioned the over flowing amount of people in there.
colmc and
OwenHargreaves
Read bottom to top for this part.
OwenHargreaves « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:13 am »
anyways, its late im gonna crash to bed, colm can explain it, he's pretty unbiased. just a drunk irishman who just sits there analysing things
colm c « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:12 am »
along with other stuff, he presented a lot of stuff together that he was confused about
colm c « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:11 am »
he revealed the message we got from russia
colm c « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:10 am »
probably a few hours before russia made the deal with korea
OwenHargreaves « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:09 am »
And for example, i made a joke poll saying we should invade all these countries and conquer India.
And it's clearly a joke because it's the most ridiculous thing ever, and he took it super seriously and mentioned it in his article.
Thiizic « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:09 am »
and what did he actually reveal?
colm c « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:09 am »
just before russia declared war on south korea
OwenHargreaves « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:08 am »
It's just as much the fact he revealed stuff in a private citizen forum, than what he actually revealed.
colm c « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:06 am »
coz to be fair, if he wont admit he was wrong, there's a risk he reveals more again
colm c « Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:05 am »
we all got pissed off, he got a 1 week ban
--------------------
2 things popped out in this interview.
1. the comment made by Owen
« Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:09 am »
And for example, i made a
joke poll saying we should
invade all these countries and
conquer India.
And it's clearly a joke because it's the most ridiculous thing ever, and he took it
super seriously and mentioned it in his article.
Politics is not a joking matter especially when you have invade and conquering in there. atleast thats what i understand from :
Bolliver Sockwash
07-07-2012 5:48:11
You talked about shit that should have stayed on the forum. I am willing to forgive but I will not forget.
Take this shit seriously or don't play at all. Also, article needs more boobs.
-------
Who seems to support Lib. but just turned on them in my view even if not intentionally.
and
2. colm c is irish!!!!
-------------
now onto some comments i found interesting.
ouzobat
07-07-2012 5:21:40
I think I am on the fence about this.
A Ban was abit over the top, however, I guess that sensitive information was leaked, which was imo, common knowledge.
You know, this is a very strange issue.
The offsite is not a mandated e-sim site, therefore the rules do not apply to the offsite. Expecting a public apology on esim I think is a little too far, however, I do think that an apology on the offsite might be good.
Banning people from the offsite sets a dangerous precedent, however, in saying this, the offsite is an area where things can be discussed away from the prying eyes of our enemies. Obviously if someone reports on these sensitive issues and puts it out there for the whole esim world to see, alarm bells have to start ringing.
Obviously its not the information that was leaked, it is more about the principle it seems, but that being said, re-instate Molson's access, even if the admins do believe that it should be at a lower level.
Molson
07-07-2012 4:33:12
Fact: No where does it state that people should not truthfully report from the forum to the same public that can access it
Fact: No where does it say it is punishable to go against these
UNWRITTEN rules
Fact: Libs was publically promoting this discussion to this same public I reported to
Fact: It was stated multiple times that this was an OPEN and PUBLIC discussion to canadian citizens
Fact: I published everything in a CANADIAN paper to the same people Libs was promoting the discussion too
Fact: I was banned without any explanation
If we were to use your logic, Libs stating to the "esim public" about what we are discussion and that we are discussion the SK war and can be considered just as bad as what you claim i did. And using the precedent set by your statement and that stated by the previous government and forum admin. Libs, at the very least, receive the same "punishment". If not he should receive more as he as an acting CP at the time,
Owen
07-07-2012 4:22:55
You were banned not because of your views, but because you released information to the general e-sim public that was meant to stay within Canadian discussion only.
The thread was located in the section called: "Citizen Private Forums" That is neither an OPEN or PUBLIC discussion as you state, but a private one among Canadian citizens and it should remain that way.
Libertines was not looking to suppress anyone's views and ignore anyone who disagreed with him, or else he wouldn't have asked the entire Canadian population for their opinion for a vote to decide democratically what would be done.
My Comment to this: is he put it out in a Canadian newspaper. it would technically be the other countries fault for spying on us.
-----------
Jacobo Gronaven
07-07-2012 6:59:22
Can you explain exactly how talking about the Russia threat in our newspaper harm the country in anyway?
Much more sensitive information got out of congress When I was in it, I know that for sure, and there was no attempt to action at all, but suddenly a differing opinion with a loud voice and BAM.
----------
Molson
Additionally, I have been convicted and
sentenced without a trial and without being able to state my case to those in charge. It was a clear cut case of guilty until proven innocent. The ironic thing is those whom provide the judgment are those who have a personal vendetta against me and let it affect their judgment.
-----
Now that isnt very nice, Molson didnt get a trial? what kind of Canadians are we? and the lack of response from Libertines. Now is not the time to take notes from the conservatives. Could this be a starting point for an upcoming revolution? Alot of good points were made and we will let you guys decide. Cant wait to see the big cock fight.
Previous article:
1st Issue! (13 years ago)
Next article:
Accused (13 years ago)